The Chronicles of Integration Deception:
Personal Witness Within Hokksund
By the decree of fate and driven by unavoidable circumstances, I was forced to emigrate from Turkmenistan, arriving legally in the Kingdom of Norway under the official humanitarian quota managed by the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (UDI).
On July 7, 2006, I landed at Oslo Gardermoen Airport. Right at the terminal, I was met by social workers from the NAV department and immediately assigned to the municipality of Øvre Eiker to begin the mandatory two-year state introduction program. My designated educational institution was the adult language school (Voksenopplæring) located in the town of Hokksund, at the exact address: Stasjonsgata 72.
It was within those very walls—an institution meant to guide newcomers into an honest Norwegian society—where I witnessed firsthand the grim reality of systemic deception, institutional fraud, and professional decay.
The Sabotage of Educational Standards:
Substandard Education: The teaching of the Norwegian language was conducted at a catastrophically low level. Instead of adhering to the state-approved educational curriculum, a massive portion of classroom time was deliberately diverted to matters entirely unrelated to actual language acquisition.
A Denied Future: Two decades have passed, yet the severe consequences of that negligent and intentionally degraded educational environment affect me to this day. By systematically lowering the bar of education for immigrants, this institution actively prevented us from fully adapting and mastering the Norwegian language. I was far from the only victim. This was a collective tragedy for hundreds of students whose chances for premium professional integration were sabotaged from day one.
The True Agenda: It is now historically evident that academic failure and curricular chaos at Stasjonsgata 72 in HOKKSUND were not accidental. Keeping migrants linguistically isolated and legally uneducated left them entirely defenseless before municipal bureaucrats. This manufactured dependency created the perfect, fertile ground for creating a subservient, managed voting bloc, thoroughly isolated from real societal advancement.
Manifesto Against Systemic Deception
Instead of providing real knowledge, the school at Stasjonsgata 72 Hokksund deliberately fostered ideological subservience. Depriving migrants of core integration tools—namely, a solid command of the language and laws—was not negligence, but a calculated move. It systematically rendered people helpless before bureaucrats. The system's true goal was to engineer a fully dependent, easily led, and disenfranchised electorate trapped inside artificial isolation.
The administration’s professional incompetence and the perpetual chaos in the curricula were no accident. This was a deeply calculated strategy to cultivate a loyal, compliant mass. Years of engineered disarray served as the perfect breeding ground to maintain control and crush any competition. This scheme allowed a supposed educational institution to be transformed into a closed party monopoly, operating solely to retain power rather than serve the people.
The educational process was turned into an assembly line for producing disenfranchised citizens. The deliberate refusal to teach actual legal norms stripped students of any ability to defend their own interests. People were consciously isolated from society. The school created a closed ghetto where a migrant's only survival mechanism was blind obedience to party handlers.
Behind the facade of social assistance hid a cynical political business. Taxpayers and the state were funding degradation rather than human capital development. Every single classroom hour at Stasjonsgata 72 Hokksund brought students closer to a total loss of independence, rather than integration. Funds were funneled directly into cementing the personal power of officials who prey on human helplessness.
Today’s chaos is the logical conclusion of years of deception and manipulation. The facade of mock benevolence has entirely crumbled, exposing the rotten core of this party enclave. This is not merely a pedagogical failure; it is a premeditated crime against the individual and society. Time has proven that this structure was never built for enlightenment, but to keep people permanently under wraps.
Ideological Dictation and Abuse of Power: How Refugee Vulnerability is Exploited
For years, the migrant integration system in Norway has harbored processes that can only be described as a gross violation of human rights and administrative coercion. A stark example of this is the activity within the Øvre Eiker municipality (Øvre Eiker kommune). Bijan Gharahkhani, a local political figure from the Norwegian Labour Party (Arbeiderpartiet) who doubles as a social worker for the NAV welfare agency, together with his wife Sara Gharahkhani (who was positioned as a teacher at the adult education school Voksenopplæring located at Stasjonsgata 72, Hokksund), effectively transformed a state integration program into a tool for party propaganda. For two years, they systematically interfered in the lives of refugees under the guise of state care.
Every day, closer to two o'clock in the afternoon, NAV official Bijan Gharahkhani would appear within the school walls to conduct intense ideological conditioning among low-literate and legally vulnerable migrants. When questioned directly about the legitimacy of his constant disruption of the educational process, he claimed to be acting as an official "supervisor." However, instead of offering genuine social assistance, he drilled the same narrative into the refugees day after day: that the Labour Party is the sole and greatest force in the kingdom looking out for them.
Most astonishingly, the school’s teachers themselves were subjected to this propaganda, obediently echoing the exact same slogans. Refugees, who find themselves in direct financial and administrative dependence on NAV decisions, were deliberately molded into a compliant electorate to secure desired election outcomes. Attempts to report this outrage to the head of the municipal administration at the time, Anders Werp, yielded no results—the system chose to ignore the blatant violations of civil service neutrality.
The Mechanics of Influence and Systemic Complicity
Observing this day after day makes it clear exactly how this cynical chain of influence is constructed. Under the direct impact of Sara Gharahkhani and her official husband, the teachers at the Voksenopplæring school in Hokksund obediently turned into transmitters of party will. Instead of high-quality language training and genuine adaptation, low-literate and disoriented refugees had their heads methodically filled with political slogans.
People who fled their countries in search of protection and justice are being cynically used right here, in the heart of Norway, as a future electoral resource. Their vulnerable position, the fear of losing social welfare payments from NAV, and a complete lack of knowledge regarding Norwegian laws became the ideal breeding ground for manipulation by Labour Party functionaries.
The attempt to break this cycle and reach out to the head of the municipal administration, Anders Werp, revealed the true depth of systemic collusion. A complaint regarding the blatant violation of human rights and political pressure inside a state institution was simply swept under the rug. This is not an isolated incident—it is a well-oiled, systemic machine of ideological conditioning that has operated for years behind the facade of "democratic integration" in Øvre Eiker.
Political Patronage and Ideological Dictation: How the State NAV System in Øvre Eiker Transformed into a Party Conditioning Machine
Norway's integration policy, which declares principles of humanism and the protection of human rights, faces shocking manifestations of administrative arbitrariness at the local level. A stark example of how state institutions are cynically used for narrow party and family interests is the long-standing activity of Norwegian Labour Party (Arbeiderpartiet) functionaries in the Øvre Eiker municipality (Øvre Eiker).
1. A Family Fiefdom within a State Institution
In the very center of Hokksund, at Stasjonsgata 72, operates an adult education school (Voksenopplæring), designed to implement state introductory programs (Introduksjonsprogram) for migrants and refugees. However, instead of a neutral educational environment, this institution has been turned into a closed zone of political influence.
The division of roles within this local system deserves special attention:
Bijan Gharahkhani — an influential local political figure of the Labour Party and, at the same time, a key social worker for the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (NAV).
Sara Gharahkhani — his wife, who secured a lobbied, highly paid, and secure ("cushy") position as a teacher in this very same school.
Such blatant familial and administrative symbiosis creates ideal conditions for unimpeded and uncontrolled interference in the personal lives of socially vulnerable individuals.
2. The Midday of Political Pressure: Daily "Supervisory" Sweeps
The integration process of refugees, who are in direct financial and legal dependence on the NAV agency, was subjected to harsh administrative pressure daily. Not a single day went by without Bijan Gharahkhani appearing within the walls of the school at Stasjonsgata 72. Year after year, invariably at midday—closer to 2:00 PM—the state official would enter the classrooms and begin his systematic activities.
When questioned directly about the legitimacy of his constant, intrusive presence during lessons and his interference in the educational process, Gharahkhani put up a convenient administrative shield, claiming that he was acting exclusively as the "official supervisor for refugees."
The Propaganda Monopoly and the Fabrication of an Electorate
However, the actual job descriptions of a NAV social worker have absolutely nothing to do with what took place in practice. Instead of social adaptation and career guidance, strictly defined political narratives were systematically and aggressively drilled into the heads of disoriented people.
3. A Monopoly on Propaganda and the Fabrication of an Electorate
A defining feature of this covert system is its absolute monopoly. Throughout the entire period of monitoring, not a single representative from other Norwegian political forces—neither from the Conservative Party (Høyre), the Progress Party (Frp), nor any centrist coalitions—was ever seen within the school walls. The political landscape inside this state educational institution was completely wiped clean.
Instead, continuous and massive ideological conditioning was conducted by Bijan Gharahkhani, his wife, and ordinary school teachers who had completely succumbed to this influence. Day after day, low-literate, frightened refugees who were entirely ignorant of Norwegian laws were drilled with an unyielding dogma: that the Norwegian Labour Party is the only "good" party, which single-handedly cares for migrants and secures their livelihood in the Kingdom.
Conclusion
This is not merely an individual official exceeding his authority. This is a coordinated, cynical administrative machine. By exploiting the refugees' fear of losing NAV welfare payments, residency status, or housing, the party functionaries in Hokksund transformed a state integration program into an assembly line designed to stamp out a loyal, controlled electorate for the Labour Party. Direct, dictatorial interference in the lives of migrants in the name of the state represents a gross violation of European human rights standards and demands an immediate investigation at the highest international level.
4. An Atmosphere of Fear and a Conspiracy of Silence: Suppressing Dissent
The natural consequence of such harsh administrative pressure was the total paralysis of will among those targeted by this propaganda. How did the refugees themselves react to these daily, two-hour visits by Bijan Gharahkhani? They did not. People remained completely silent. Stunned by the fear of losing social welfare payments, being stripped of their legal status, or finding themselves homeless in a foreign land, they submissively accepted this daily ideological dictation. The vulnerable position of the migrants made them an ideal, uncomplaining target for manipulation.
The only person in the entire school who openly, directly, and uncompromisingly resisted this lawlessness was the author of these lines.
5. A Clash of Intellect with Administrative Arbitrariness
For the local establishment elite, my resistance became a dangerous precedent. Carina Alice, the director of these integration courses, and the school teachers under her complete control, instantly adopted a hostile stance. A paradoxical and tragicomic situation emerged: a dull, compliant administrative machine attempted to marginalize and make an "idiot" out of a person whose intellectual and professional caliber is incomparable to the entire staff of this institution.
Holding a Ph.D. in Jurisprudence, being the author of 4 fundamental monographs on forensics, and having written 7 books on highly complex international issues, I was, in essence, the only truly educated, cultured, and legally literate person within those walls. It was precisely my understanding of the law, human rights, and violation-tracking mechanisms that triggered an instinctual fear and deep-seated animosity from Carina Alice and her circle.
Instead of a civilized discussion, the school administration and NAV supervisors deployed classic mechanisms of psychological pressure and systemic collusion. They attempted to devalue my expertise and frame the lawful protest of a legal scholar as a personal deviation. However, their methods merely confirmed the complete helplessness of the system when faced with an open, reasoned, and professional truth.
6. Methods of Administrative Harassment: How Carina Alice and the Teachers Attempted to Break a Doctor of Jurisprudence
When the school administration, represented by Carina Alice, realized that their party propaganda had hit a brick wall of professional legal resistance, they resorted to underhanded methods of psychological pressure. Lacking the ability to debate me on an intellectual and legal level, the director and her subordinate teachers launched a coordinated campaign of defamation and moral coercion directly inside the classrooms.
Their tactics consisted of several key elements:
Artificial Isolation and Public Devaluation: During classes, whenever I attempted to point out legal inconsistencies in their lectures or asked direct, critical questions of Bijan Gharahkhani, the teachers demonstratively cut me off. Carina Alice personally instructed the faculty to ignore my remarks, interrupt me mid-sentence, and frame my professional observations as "inappropriate" or "disruptive to the educational process." Before an audience of frightened, silent refugees, they tried to create the false illusion that a Ph.D. holder and expert in international law supposedly "failed to understand simple concepts."
Organized Gaslighting and Attempts to Frame as an "Idiot": Every time I exposed their lies and manipulations with reasoned arguments, citing Norwegian laws and human rights standards, the teachers shifted their tone to a patronizingly mock-derisive one.
They attempted to convince everyone around that my claims were groundless and my behavior was improper. This was a calculated attempt at psychological suffocation, designed to force an individual to doubt their own righteousness and fall silent under the pressure of the collective.
Threats of Administrative Consequences: Carina Alice repeatedly employed covert blackmail, hinting that my "disobedience" and open protests against the visits from the NAV party supervisor could negatively impact documentation, reports, and the final completion of the integration program. To the vulnerable refugees, they transmitted a direct signal: "Look at what happens to those who ask too many questions and oppose the Labour Party."
This dull bureaucratic clique genuinely believed that by surrounding a Doctor of Jurisprudence and author of monographs with a crowd of obedient executioners, they could force him to capitulate. But they miscalculated. Every single attempt of theirs to pressure me, every instance of their aggression, and every act of nepotism involving the NAV agency was meticulously documented. Instead of breaking me, their unlawful actions merely added to the evidentiary base of my extensive investigation, which is now moving to an international level.
7. IMDi’s Financial Fiction: Empty Halls and Million-Kroner Embezzlement Under the Guise of Integration
Behind the facade of "active community work" performed by Bijan Gharahkhani and his bureaucratic group lay a cynical and deeply corrupt scheme for siphoning state funds. The main source of funding for all these integration programs and courses was the Norwegian Directorate of Integration and Diversity (IMDi), which allocates colossal annual budgets for refugee adaptation. However, the manner and destination of where this money went in the Øvre Eiker municipality demand immediate intervention from law enforcement agencies.
In practice, the "integration" scheme functioned as follows:
Simulating High Activity in Empty Halls: Large-scale lectures, seminars, and meetings were regularly organized, serving as vehicles to write off massive amounts of budget money. On paper, these events were declared as "successful integration projects with hundreds of participants." In reality, the halls remained completely empty. The refugees, understanding the futility and purely propagandistic nature of these meetings, simply did not attend. Yet, this did not trouble the organizers—for their financial reports to IMDi, the mere fact that the event took place, a checkmark in the documentation, and beautiful reporting were sufficient to mask the blatant plundering of budget funds.
The Failure of Integration and Rising Crime Rates: While the Gharahkhani group and the school leadership were absorbing IMDi state grants, the actual indicators of migrant integration plummeted rapidly to the bottom. Instead of receiving high-quality language training, acquiring in-demand professions, and genuinely adapting to Norwegian society, the refugees were left entirely to their own devices. The logical outcome of such sham operations was a catastrophically high level of crime and marginalization among migrants in the region. A program designed to foster safety and order was turned into its complete opposite due to the greed of local officials.
State money—the taxes of Norwegian citizens, which should have been directed toward providing genuine help to people and protecting society—settled for years in the pockets of a narrow circle of individuals who positioned themselves at the "cushy" source of IMDi funding. This integration model proved to be a colossal failure masked by beautiful reports and party slogans, causing direct damage to both the Norwegian state and the refugees themselves.
8. Institutional Blindness and Systemic Collusion: How Norway's Regulatory Bodies Covered Up the Sham
The most shocking element of this multi-year scheme is the absolute inaction and indifference from the very state structures legally bound to strictly monitor every single krone spent. The fact that Bijan Gharahkhani and the school leadership spent years reporting empty halls and failed integration programs to the Directorate of Integration and Diversity (IMDi) points to a profound systemic crisis and institutional collusion within regulatory bodies.
Norway's oversight authorities closed their eyes to these occurrences through specific administrative mechanisms:
If the figures on paper matched the allocated budget, the audit was deemed successfully passed.
Political Cover and the Party Shield: Since Bijan Gharahkhani was a prominent local functionary of the Labour Party, and the party itself had held strong positions across various state ministries and agencies for years, a mechanism of political solidarity was triggered. Any signals of violations coming from below were perceived by officials in Oslo not as a reason for an anti-corruption investigation, but as "unwanted noise" that could cast a shadow on the party's image. The system protected its own.
Ignoring Direct Reports: All attempts by the author—a Doctor of Jurisprudence—to officially bring the misuse of budget funds to the attention of the municipal leadership and regulatory bodies hit a brick wall of bureaucratic sabotage. Letters and reports were bogged down in red tape, forwarded from one agency to another, or archived under the pretext of "insufficient grounds for an investigation." The oversight bodies deliberately refused to notice the empty halls, since acknowledging this fact would mean admitting the complete failure of the entire state regulatory system.
Thus, Norway’s regulatory structures transformed from independent arbiters into silent accomplices of this budgetary assembly line. Through their criminal negligence, they created a regime of total impunity for the local establishment, allowing a crucial state program to be turned into a closed, corrupt business.
The clash of an independent legal scholar with this entrenched system has exposed a profound crisis within Norwegian legal institutions at the local level. When internal review mechanisms are deliberately blocked, and systemic collusion binds NAV officials, school management, and municipal leadership together, classical methods of fighting within the framework of national law cease to function. An autonomous zone of administrative arbitrariness has been established in Øvre Eiker. Within this zone, personal connections and party cards carry far more weight than the country's Constitution, international obligations, or civil service transparency standards.
Since Norway's internal oversight bodies have demonstrated total institutional blindness, this case is moving conclusively into the domain of international law. The facts regarding the harsh pressure exerted on refugees, the falsification of IMDi reporting, and the harassment of a Doctor of Jurisprudence for his professional stance will become the subject of proceedings in European human rights institutions. The documents, which meticulously record every violation at Stasjonsgata 72, are being prepared for submission to international monitoring groups. The local establishment will no longer succeed in hiding its corrupt schemes behind the quiet inner offices of the municipality.
The months-long campaign of gaslighting, isolation, and covert threats deployed by director Carina Alice and her subordinate teachers pursued a single goal—to morally destroy and silence an individual capable of providing an accurate legal classification of these occurrences. However, this dull bureaucratic clique failed to consider that intellect, reinforced by a fundamental knowledge of law, cannot be broken by primitive administrative pressure. Every attempt at coercion only strengthened my resolve to bring this investigation to its logical conclusion. They expected compliance, but instead received a meticulously documented criminal dossier.
The experience of the Voksenopplæring school in Hokksund clearly demonstrates why the state integration program in the region has suffered a crushing fiasco. It is impossible to adapt people to life in a legal and democratic state using methods of dictation, deception, and party segregation. Sham events held before empty halls, the misuse of millions in IMDi grants, and the transformation of vulnerable migrants into a disenfranchised electoral resource have logically led to increased marginalization. This system has consumed itself from within. It has left behind nothing but shattered lives and colossal financial losses for Norwegian taxpayers.
Drawing a line under this extensive investigation, it can be stated with certainty: the masks have been torn off, and the facade of "humane care" is completely shattered. The activities of Bijan Gharahkhani, his wife Sara, and the administrators who covered for them are not an accidental glitch, but a premeditated crime against the individual and society. The era of closed party monopolies preying on human helplessness and state budgets is drawing to a close. This material is not merely a journalistic article, but an official manifesto and an indictment. It initiates the process for the complete dismantling of the corrupt enclave in Øvre Eiker.
From Local Arbitrary Practices to an International Investigation: The Origins of a Twenty-Year Inquiry
For the local bureaucratic establishment in Øvre Eiker, I was likely expected to become yet another individual forced to silently accept administrative pressure and submit to the existing order of affairs. Their miscalculation, however, was that the methods of psychological pressure, misinformation, manipulation of facts, and administrative coercion were directed against a person professionally trained in law, forensic science, and analytical research.
Every decision made by public officials, every action undertaken by administrative authorities, and every procedure raising questions regarding legality, transparency, and good governance was carefully documented and preserved. What initially appeared to be isolated incidents of administrative arbitrariness gradually revealed itself as part of a broader pattern in which formal procedures often replaced the genuine principles of justice, equality, and the rule of law.
It was precisely the observation of this persistent combination of bureaucratic opacity, political loyalty, institutional irresponsibility, and the non-transparent expenditure of public funds under the banner of integration programs that became the starting point for a large-scale independent investigation that has continued for more than two decades.
Over time, a substantial body of evidence was assembled. For many years, documents, official correspondence, financial records, witness testimonies, public sources, and other materials were collected and analyzed in order to identify the actual mechanisms behind decision-making processes and the allocation of public resources. What began as an effort to defend my own rights and draw attention to the circumstances faced by others in similar situations gradually evolved into a comprehensive examination of the activities of individual officials, administrative institutions, and the political mechanisms connected to them.
As the evidence accumulated, it became increasingly apparent that the issues under examination were not merely a local problem confined to a single municipality or government agency. The patterns that emerged pointed to broader systemic processes involving public administration, oversight of public expenditures, the protection of human rights, and the effectiveness of legal institutions.
Recognizing the limitations of obtaining an objective legal assessment exclusively through domestic mechanisms, the results of many years of research and investigation were systematically organized and consolidated into a comprehensive two-volume study based on documentary evidence, verified facts, and analytical findings.
Today, this investigation extends far beyond the boundaries of a local dispute and has acquired an international dimension. The collected materials constitute a significant body of documented information requiring careful examination and legal assessment by competent institutions. Questions concerning human rights, the legality of governmental actions, the transparency of financial mechanisms, and the accountability of public officials are increasingly becoming matters of international as well as national significance.
A story that began with individual episodes of administrative pressure and attempts to discourage a person from exercising his lawful rights has ultimately developed into a long-term documented inquiry into legality, governmental accountability, and the functioning of public institutions. In the end, it is facts, documents, and evidence—not administrative power or political influence—that possess the ability to provide objective answers to the questions raised by this investigation.
Here is my opinion: a completely updated and intensified text regarding the severe issue of refugee and migrant integration in Norway, which carries criminal undertones.
9. The National Budget Exploitation Network of IMDi: LIM Director General Sarah Gaulin and the Oslo-Buskerud Shadow Syndicate
The local corruption pipeline in Hokksund, engineered by Bedjan Garakhani, inevitably required powerful allies at the national level—precisely where millions in government subsidies are distributed. One of the most notorious and prominent figures in this grant-grabbing chain is Sarah Gaulin, who holds the high-status position of Director General of the LIM organization (Likestilling, Integrering, Mangfold — Equality, Integration, Diversity).
As natives of Iran, Gaulin and Garakhani exploited their ethnic status and human rights slogans to effectively establish a parallel system for siphoning Norwegian taxpayers' funds, entrapping key regions across the country. The operations of this network expanded across a vast territory, stretching from government offices in Oslo to municipal institutions in the Buskerud region. In practice, the title of "Director General" in such a non-governmental organization (NGO) served as a convenient smokescreen. Under the guise of "fighting for integration and equality," the LIM organization secured colossal financial backing from IMDi for years.
10. The Shadow Alliance: Sabotaging Integration and Plundering Taxpayers' Money from the Capital to the Provinces
The activities of Sarah Gaulin must be scrutinized by law enforcement agencies and international investigators on equal footing with the actions of Bedjan Garakhani. They represent two sides of the same coin, having divided their spheres of influence between the capital and the regions:
The Grant Monopoly under the LIM Banner: While Bedjan Garakhani simulated integration processes on the ground—gathering empty halls in the Øvre Eiker municipality of the Buskerud region—Sarah Gaulin provided ideological and institutional cover for this fiction at the highest level in Oslo. The LIM organization under her control received state subsidies to run programs that, in practice, yielded no real results for public safety, yet efficiently devoured budget krones.
The Primary Plunderer of IMDi Budgetary Funds: An analysis of her 20-year career indicates that her status as a migrant rights advocate was used solely as a tool for personal enrichment and draining money from the state budget. Norwegian taxpayers' funds, intended to reduce crime among refugees and facilitate their genuine adaptation, vanished without a trace into the grant labyrinths of LIM in Oslo, while migrant neighborhoods in Buskerud sank further into marginalization and crime.
· 11. Demand for a Total Investigation Spanning 20 Years
· Norwegian law enforcement agencies and international structures are obligated to conduct a full-scale audit of all financial, operational, and political activities of Sarah Gaulin, Bedjan Garakhani, and their LIM organization over the past two decades within Oslo and the Buskerud county. Their connections to the Labour Party, NAV officials, and local coordinators clearly demonstrate the inner workings of this mafia-style grant network.
· This is not merely negligence—it is a systemic, organized scam of national proportions, where the slogan of "integration" serves as a cover for the blatant plundering of the national budget. The activities of Gaulin, Garakhani, and their patrons in Oslo and Buskerud must become the subject of a deep criminal investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice, the FBI, and specialized intelligence agencies capable of breaking this long-standing cycle of complicity and corruption.
